8+ Compare: Traditional vs Roth 401k Calculator Tool


8+ Compare: Traditional vs Roth 401k Calculator Tool

A tool designed to estimate and compare the potential financial outcomes of utilizing a traditional 401(k) versus a Roth 401(k) retirement savings plan. This tool typically requires inputs such as current income, contribution rate, estimated tax bracket in retirement, and expected investment growth rate to project account balances and potential tax liabilities under both scenarios. For example, one might input a current salary of $75,000, a 10% contribution rate, an anticipated retirement tax bracket of 22%, and an expected investment growth rate of 7% to see projections for both types of plans.

The significance of employing such an instrument lies in its ability to assist individuals in making informed decisions about their retirement savings strategy. Understanding the potential impact of taxes, both now and in the future, is crucial for maximizing retirement income. Historically, the choice between these plans was often made without a clear understanding of the long-term implications. These instruments offer a way to quantify and visualize the differences, empowering individuals to select the plan that best aligns with their financial goals and risk tolerance.

The following sections will delve into the key factors that differentiate these retirement savings options, explore how to effectively utilize a financial planning instrument to compare them, and discuss the circumstances under which each type of plan may be more advantageous.

1. Tax implications comparison

The utility of a “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” is intrinsically linked to its ability to facilitate a comprehensive tax implications comparison. A primary distinction between the traditional and Roth 401(k) lies in when taxes are levied. With a traditional 401(k), contributions are made pre-tax, reducing current taxable income, but withdrawals in retirement are taxed as ordinary income. Conversely, a Roth 401(k) involves after-tax contributions, allowing for tax-free withdrawals during retirement. The calculator quantifies these differences, projecting future tax liabilities under each scenario. For instance, if an individual anticipates a higher tax bracket in retirement, the Roth 401(k) may prove more advantageous due to its tax-free withdrawals, a conclusion the calculator can help illustrate.

The “Tax implications comparison” component of these calculators is vital because it directly impacts the net amount of retirement income available. It allows users to model scenarios based on varying assumptions about future tax rates. Without this function, individuals would have to manually calculate the tax implications of each plan under different conditions, a complex and time-consuming process. A practical example would be an individual who expects their income to increase substantially during their career. This expectation might lead to a higher tax bracket in retirement, making the Roth 401(k)’s tax-free withdrawals more appealing. The calculator facilitates this analysis by displaying the projected after-tax income for both plan types under these conditions.

In conclusion, the “Tax implications comparison” feature is a cornerstone of a “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator.” It provides a concrete basis for choosing between the two plan types by quantifying the effects of taxation at different points in time. While predicting future tax rates is inherently uncertain, the tool enables users to explore different possible outcomes and plan accordingly. Understanding this comparative tax framework is essential for optimizing retirement savings and maximizing after-tax income during retirement.

2. Future tax bracket estimation

Future tax bracket estimation is a pivotal input when utilizing a “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator”. The accuracy of this estimation directly influences the projected outcomes and the subsequent decision-making process regarding retirement savings plans. It is a speculative endeavor that necessitates consideration of various economic and personal financial factors.

  • Impact on Plan Selection

    Estimating one’s future tax bracket is critical because it determines whether a traditional or Roth 401(k) is more financially advantageous. If a lower tax bracket is anticipated in retirement, the traditional 401(k) may be preferable, as taxes are deferred until withdrawal. Conversely, if a higher tax bracket is expected, the Roth 401(k) might be more suitable, allowing for tax-free withdrawals. For example, an individual currently in a low tax bracket who anticipates significant career advancement and increased income might project a higher retirement tax bracket, thus favoring the Roth option. This prediction directly impacts the output of the “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator”.

  • Challenges in Prediction

    Predicting future tax brackets is inherently difficult due to uncertainties surrounding changes in tax laws, personal income fluctuations, and macroeconomic conditions. Tax laws can be altered by future administrations, potentially increasing or decreasing tax rates across various income levels. Personal income can vary due to career changes, investments, or unforeseen circumstances. Economic factors, such as inflation and recessions, can also influence tax brackets. Therefore, a reasonable approach involves considering multiple scenarios, including optimistic, pessimistic, and neutral projections. The “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” can then be used to assess the implications of each scenario.

  • Methods for Estimation

    Estimating future tax brackets involves a combination of factors, including analyzing historical tax data, considering projected income growth, and evaluating potential changes in tax policies. One might examine past tax law changes and consult financial experts or tax professionals for insights. Projecting future income involves considering career prospects, potential investment returns, and anticipated inflation. It is also important to consider potential deductions and credits that may be available in retirement. Incorporating these elements into the “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” enhances the accuracy and relevance of the projections.

  • Sensitivity Analysis

    Given the inherent uncertainty in predicting future tax brackets, a sensitivity analysis is essential. This involves running the “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” with different tax bracket scenarios to understand the range of potential outcomes. For instance, one might project outcomes based on a constant tax bracket, a moderately higher tax bracket, and a significantly higher tax bracket. This analysis reveals the potential downside risk and upside potential of each plan, allowing for a more informed decision. If the results are highly sensitive to changes in the projected tax bracket, a more conservative approach might be warranted, such as diversifying retirement savings across both traditional and Roth accounts.

In summary, the accurate estimation of future tax brackets is paramount to effectively employing a “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator.” While precise prediction is impossible, a thorough and well-reasoned estimation process, coupled with sensitivity analysis, enhances the value and reliability of the tool’s projections, ultimately aiding in more informed retirement planning decisions.

3. Contribution rate impact assessment

Contribution rate impact assessment is an integral function of a “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator”. This feature allows users to model the long-term effects of different contribution levels on their retirement savings, thereby informing decisions about how much of their income to allocate to their 401(k) account. Understanding the implications of varying contribution rates is crucial for maximizing retirement savings potential.

  • Projected Account Balance

    A “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” projects the account balance at retirement based on a specified contribution rate. Increasing the contribution rate, even by a small percentage, can lead to a significantly larger retirement nest egg due to the effects of compounding. For example, increasing a contribution rate from 5% to 7% of salary can result in tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars more in retirement savings over several decades, depending on salary and investment returns. The calculator quantifies this difference, providing a concrete illustration of the benefits of higher contributions.

  • Impact on Tax Liability

    The contribution rate also influences the immediate tax liability, particularly with a traditional 401(k). Higher contributions lower current taxable income, which can result in immediate tax savings. However, this also means a larger taxable withdrawal in retirement. The calculator models these effects, showcasing the trade-off between current and future tax liabilities. For example, an individual contributing 15% of their income to a traditional 401(k) will experience a greater reduction in their current tax bill compared to someone contributing 5%. The tool demonstrates how these initial savings affect the long-term accumulation and taxation of retirement funds.

  • Years to Retirement

    The contribution rate impacts the number of years required to reach a specific retirement savings goal. Higher contribution rates can enable earlier retirement or the achievement of more ambitious retirement income targets. The “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” can be used to assess different scenarios. For example, an individual aiming to retire with $1 million might find that increasing their contribution rate by a few percentage points reduces their working years by several years. This provides tangible motivation for increasing savings contributions.

  • Comparison of Roth vs. Traditional

    The contribution rate impact can differ significantly between Roth and traditional 401(k) plans. With a Roth 401(k), contributions are made after-tax, so increasing the contribution rate does not lower current taxable income. However, the benefit is tax-free withdrawals in retirement. The calculator facilitates a direct comparison of the long-term outcomes. For example, one might find that while contributing 10% to a traditional 401(k) provides an immediate tax benefit, contributing the same 10% to a Roth 401(k) yields a higher after-tax retirement income due to tax-free withdrawals, especially if a higher tax bracket is projected.

In conclusion, the contribution rate impact assessment is a critical function within a “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator”. It provides a quantifiable view of the consequences of various contribution levels, enabling informed decisions about retirement savings strategies and maximizing long-term financial security. By modeling the impact on account balances, tax liabilities, and retirement timelines, the calculator empowers users to make choices aligned with their financial goals and risk tolerance.

4. Investment growth projections

Investment growth projections are a fundamental component within a “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator”. These projections estimate the future value of retirement savings based on assumed rates of return, significantly influencing the comparative analysis between traditional and Roth 401(k) plans.

  • Rate of Return Assumptions

    The projected rate of return is a critical input, reflecting the anticipated growth of investments within the 401(k) account. This rate is often based on historical market data, asset allocation strategies, and personal risk tolerance. For example, a more aggressive investment strategy, with a higher allocation to stocks, might project a higher average annual return, but also carries greater risk. The “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” utilizes this rate to extrapolate the future account balance under both the traditional and Roth scenarios. Variations in the assumed rate of return can substantially alter the projected outcomes.

  • Impact on Account Balance

    The projected investment growth directly impacts the final account balance at retirement. Higher growth rates lead to larger account balances, magnifying the effects of compounding interest over time. This is particularly relevant when comparing the tax implications of traditional versus Roth 401(k) plans. For instance, if high investment growth is projected, the tax-free withdrawals of a Roth 401(k) may become more advantageous, as the tax savings are realized on a larger sum. The “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” illustrates this relationship by showing the projected after-tax retirement income under different growth scenarios.

  • Risk and Volatility

    Investment growth projections are inherently subject to risk and volatility. Actual investment returns can deviate significantly from projected rates due to market fluctuations and unforeseen economic events. A “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” may incorporate sensitivity analysis, allowing users to assess the impact of different growth rate scenarios on the projected outcomes. This helps in understanding the potential range of outcomes and making more informed decisions based on risk tolerance. For example, running the calculator with both a high and low growth rate provides a better understanding of the potential downside risk associated with more aggressive investment strategies.

  • Inflation Adjustment

    To provide a realistic assessment of retirement income, investment growth projections should be adjusted for inflation. Inflation erodes the purchasing power of money over time, so a nominal growth rate must be discounted by the expected inflation rate to reflect the real growth of retirement savings. A “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” may include an inflation adjustment factor, which reduces the projected investment growth rate to reflect the real rate of return. This adjustment is crucial for estimating the actual living standard that retirement savings can support.

In summary, investment growth projections are a crucial element within a “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator”, influencing the projected account balances and the comparative analysis between traditional and Roth 401(k) plans. By considering various factors, such as rate of return assumptions, risk and volatility, and inflation adjustment, the tool provides a more comprehensive assessment of retirement savings potential and informs strategic decision-making.

5. Retirement income simulation

Retirement income simulation is a critical function within a “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator”. This simulation projects the potential stream of income available during retirement based on factors such as accumulated savings, estimated expenses, and withdrawal strategies. The “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” relies on this simulation to provide a clear picture of the financial outcomes associated with each type of 401(k) plan. The accuracy of the simulation directly affects the users ability to make informed decisions about their retirement savings. For instance, an individual might use the simulator to determine if their projected retirement income, after accounting for taxes, will be sufficient to cover their anticipated living expenses. The simulation outputs, such as projected annual income, helps the user determine whether to contribute more to their 401(k) or to adjust their asset allocation.

The simulation accounts for the tax implications unique to each plan. With a traditional 401(k), withdrawals are taxed as ordinary income, thereby reducing the net income available during retirement. The “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” incorporates the projected tax rate during retirement to estimate the after-tax income. Conversely, Roth 401(k) withdrawals are tax-free, resulting in a higher net income, particularly if the individual’s tax bracket is expected to be higher in retirement. An example would be a scenario where the tool projects that a traditional 401(k) would yield a pre-tax annual income of $50,000, but after taxes, the actual income would be $40,000. Under a Roth 401(k) with the same pre-tax potential, the projected after-tax income might remain at $50,000. This difference highlights the importance of the income simulation in discerning the actual financial impact of each retirement savings plan.

In conclusion, retirement income simulation within a “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” is essential for visualizing the long-term financial consequences of each plan. It accounts for factors such as tax liabilities, projected investment growth, and withdrawal strategies to provide a realistic estimate of the income available during retirement. While challenges exist in accurately predicting future tax rates and investment returns, the simulation remains a valuable tool for making informed decisions and optimizing retirement savings strategies. Its practical significance lies in enabling individuals to proactively plan for their financial future and to choose the retirement savings option that best aligns with their individual circumstances and financial goals.

6. Break-even analysis duration

Break-even analysis duration, in the context of a “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator”, represents the period required for the cumulative benefits of one retirement savings plan to equal or surpass those of the alternative plan. It is a crucial metric for individuals seeking to determine which option, traditional or Roth 401(k), is more financially advantageous given their specific circumstances and financial projections.

  • Definition and Calculation

    The break-even point is calculated by comparing the present value of future tax liabilities associated with a traditional 401(k) against the after-tax contributions of a Roth 401(k). The duration is influenced by factors such as contribution rate, investment growth, and anticipated tax rates in retirement. A shorter break-even duration implies that the Roth 401(k) becomes favorable more quickly, while a longer duration suggests the traditional 401(k) is better suited, at least in the short term.

  • Tax Rate Influence

    The projected tax rate during retirement plays a significant role in determining the break-even duration. If an individual anticipates a lower tax bracket in retirement than their current bracket, the break-even point for a traditional 401(k) will be shorter. This is because the tax benefits received now, at a higher rate, outweigh the taxes paid later at a lower rate. Conversely, if a higher tax bracket is expected, the Roth 401(k) break-even duration will be shorter, as the tax-free withdrawals become more valuable.

  • Investment Performance Impact

    Higher investment returns generally shorten the break-even duration for a Roth 401(k). The tax-free growth within a Roth account allows the investment gains to compound without being subject to taxation upon withdrawal. This effect becomes more pronounced as investment returns increase. A “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” will illustrate this by showing how varying growth rates affect the point at which the Roth 401(k) surpasses the traditional option in terms of overall value.

  • Contribution Strategy Considerations

    The contribution strategy, including the amount and consistency of contributions, also affects the break-even duration. Higher contribution rates, particularly early in one’s career, can shorten the break-even point for a Roth 401(k) due to the compounding effect of tax-free growth. Conversely, lower or inconsistent contributions may extend the break-even duration, making the traditional 401(k) a more appealing option for those with limited savings capacity.

The break-even analysis duration, as computed by a “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator”, provides a quantifiable measure for evaluating the relative benefits of each plan. By understanding the factors that influence this duration, individuals can make more informed decisions about their retirement savings strategy, aligning their choices with their financial goals and risk tolerance.

7. Inflation adjusted returns modeling

Inflation adjusted returns modeling is a crucial component of any robust “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator.” This process adjusts nominal investment returns for the effects of inflation, providing a more realistic assessment of the purchasing power of retirement savings in the future. Without this adjustment, projected retirement income can be significantly overstated, leading to flawed decision-making.

  • Erosion of Purchasing Power

    Inflation gradually diminishes the value of money, reducing the quantity of goods and services that a fixed sum can purchase. A “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” that fails to account for inflation will present an overly optimistic view of retirement income. For instance, a projected retirement income of $100,000 per year might seem adequate, but if inflation averages 3% annually, the actual purchasing power of that income will decline significantly over time. Ignoring this effect can lead to under-saving or an inappropriate asset allocation strategy.

  • Real Rate of Return

    Inflation adjusted returns modeling relies on calculating the real rate of return, which is the nominal rate of return minus the inflation rate. This provides a more accurate depiction of investment performance. For example, if an investment earns a nominal return of 7% per year and inflation is 3%, the real rate of return is 4%. A “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” uses the real rate of return to project the future value of retirement savings in today’s dollars, allowing for a more meaningful comparison between the traditional and Roth 401(k) options.

  • Impact on Withdrawal Strategies

    Inflation adjusted returns modeling is essential for determining sustainable withdrawal rates during retirement. A common rule of thumb is the 4% rule, which suggests that retirees can withdraw 4% of their savings in the first year of retirement and adjust that amount for inflation each subsequent year. A “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” can simulate different withdrawal strategies based on inflation adjusted returns, helping individuals assess the longevity of their retirement savings and avoid outliving their assets.

  • Tax Implications

    The interaction between inflation and taxes further underscores the importance of inflation adjusted returns modeling. Taxes are typically levied on nominal investment gains, not real gains. This means that individuals may be paying taxes on inflationary gains that do not represent an actual increase in purchasing power. A “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” that incorporates inflation adjusted returns can provide a more accurate assessment of the after-tax value of retirement savings, particularly when comparing the traditional and Roth 401(k) options, which have different tax treatments.

In summary, inflation adjusted returns modeling is a necessary feature of a “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator.” It provides a more realistic projection of retirement income by accounting for the erosion of purchasing power over time. By considering the real rate of return, withdrawal strategies, and tax implications, this modeling enhances the accuracy and usefulness of the tool, enabling individuals to make more informed decisions about their retirement savings.

8. Withdrawal strategy visualization

Withdrawal strategy visualization is a critical component of a robust “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator”. It provides a graphical or tabular representation of how retirement savings might be drawn down over time, illustrating the potential impact of different withdrawal rates and tax implications specific to either a traditional or Roth 401(k). This feature allows users to assess the sustainability of their retirement income and to understand how varying withdrawal approaches affect the longevity of their savings. For instance, a user might compare a fixed percentage withdrawal strategy to a strategy adjusted for inflation, observing how each impacts the duration for which their funds will last. Without this visualization, assessing the feasibility of various retirement income scenarios becomes significantly more difficult, as individuals would need to manually calculate and project the effects of each strategy.

The practical significance of withdrawal strategy visualization lies in its capacity to highlight the distinct advantages and disadvantages of traditional versus Roth 401(k) plans. Consider a scenario where a retiree requires a consistent after-tax income. A “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” can visualize how the required gross withdrawal amount from a traditional 401(k) will need to be larger due to income taxes, potentially depleting the savings faster than a Roth 401(k), where withdrawals are tax-free. Conversely, if an individual anticipates a lower tax bracket in retirement, the visualizations might demonstrate that a traditional 401(k) offers a more sustainable withdrawal strategy due to the reduced tax burden. This capacity to compare scenarios is vital for making informed decisions tailored to individual financial circumstances and expectations.

In summary, withdrawal strategy visualization significantly enhances the utility of a “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” by providing a clear and intuitive understanding of how retirement savings can be accessed and managed. It enables users to assess the sustainability of their retirement income, to compare the tax implications of traditional and Roth 401(k) plans, and to make informed decisions about their long-term financial security. While challenges exist in accurately projecting future market returns and tax rates, the visualizations offer a valuable framework for planning and adjusting retirement strategies.

Frequently Asked Questions

This section addresses common inquiries regarding the utilization and interpretation of results from a financial tool designed to compare traditional and Roth 401(k) retirement savings plans. The information provided aims to clarify key aspects and potential applications of these instruments.

Question 1: What primary inputs are essential for accurate projections when utilizing a “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator”?

Accurate projections necessitate, at minimum, the following inputs: current annual income, planned contribution rate (percentage of income), estimated tax bracket during retirement, anticipated investment growth rate, and years until retirement. Additional inputs, such as current 401(k) balance and any planned lump-sum contributions, can further refine the accuracy of the projections.

Question 2: How does a “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” account for the time value of money?

A “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” accounts for the time value of money by discounting future cash flows (such as retirement income) back to their present value. This process incorporates a discount rate, typically based on an expected rate of return or an inflation rate, to reflect the fact that money received in the future is worth less than money received today.

Question 3: Can a “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” predict future tax law changes, and how should one account for this uncertainty?

A “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” cannot predict future tax law changes. To account for this uncertainty, conduct sensitivity analysis by running the calculator with different tax bracket scenarios for retirement. This approach allows for the assessment of potential outcomes under varying tax conditions, providing a more robust basis for decision-making.

Question 4: What limitations exist when using a “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator,” and how can these be mitigated?

Limitations include the inability to perfectly predict future investment returns, tax rates, and personal financial circumstances. To mitigate these limitations, use conservative estimates, conduct sensitivity analyses, and regularly update the calculator with current information. Consultation with a qualified financial advisor is also recommended.

Question 5: How does a “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” factor in inflation, and why is this important?

A “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” factors in inflation by adjusting future income and expense projections to reflect the expected rate of inflation. This is important because inflation erodes the purchasing power of money over time, and failure to account for it can result in an overestimation of the adequacy of retirement savings.

Question 6: Is a “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” a substitute for professional financial advice?

A “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” is a valuable tool for estimating and comparing retirement savings scenarios, but it is not a substitute for professional financial advice. The calculator provides generalized projections based on user-provided inputs. Professional financial advice considers individual circumstances, risk tolerance, and specific financial goals, offering tailored recommendations.

In summary, while a “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” offers a useful framework for evaluating retirement savings options, understanding its limitations and seeking professional guidance are crucial for making well-informed financial decisions.

The next section will delve into case studies illustrating the practical application of these calculations in various financial scenarios.

Tips for Effective Use of a traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator

Optimizing the utility of a “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” necessitates a methodical approach to input selection and result interpretation. The following tips offer guidance for maximizing the effectiveness of this tool.

Tip 1: Utilize Realistic Investment Growth Rates: Employ conservative investment growth rate assumptions, typically ranging from 5% to 7%, to account for market volatility and potential economic downturns. Projecting overly optimistic returns can lead to inaccurate assessments of retirement income adequacy.

Tip 2: Employ Multiple Tax Bracket Scenarios: Model various retirement tax bracket scenarios to assess the impact of potential tax law changes and fluctuations in personal income. This sensitivity analysis provides a more comprehensive understanding of the potential range of outcomes.

Tip 3: Account for Inflation Consistently: Ensure the “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” consistently adjusts projected retirement income and expenses for inflation. Failure to do so can result in an overestimation of purchasing power during retirement.

Tip 4: Refine Contribution Rate Projections: Experiment with different contribution rates to identify the optimal balance between current tax savings and future retirement income. A higher contribution rate may be necessary to achieve desired retirement income goals.

Tip 5: Assess the Impact of Early Withdrawals: Model the impact of potential early withdrawals on the overall retirement savings. Early withdrawals can significantly reduce the accumulated balance and may incur penalties.

Tip 6: Review Fund Expenses: Factor in annual fees or expense ratios charged on investment options. These expenses, although seemingly small, can erode returns over time.

Tip 7: Consider Employer Matching Contributions: Include any employer matching contributions to accurately represent the growth of contributions. Ensure matching contributions are factored into calculations.

Adhering to these tips enhances the precision and usefulness of the “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator,” facilitating more informed decisions regarding retirement savings strategies.

The subsequent section will provide real-world case studies demonstrating the application of these calculations in diverse financial contexts, thereby offering a clearer understanding of their practical value.

Conclusion

The preceding discussion has elucidated the multifaceted nature of employing a “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator” as a tool for informed retirement planning. Key elements explored include the significance of accurate input data, particularly concerning future tax brackets and investment growth rates, as well as the crucial role of inflation adjustment and sensitivity analysis in producing reliable projections. Furthermore, the examination highlighted the utility of withdrawal strategy visualization in assessing the sustainability of retirement income across different scenarios.

The effective utilization of such an instrument empowers individuals to make judicious decisions regarding their retirement savings. While not a substitute for personalized financial counsel, this tool provides a valuable framework for understanding the potential long-term financial implications of choosing between traditional and Roth 401(k) plans. Prudent use of a “traditional 401k vs roth 401k calculator,” coupled with professional guidance, can contribute significantly to securing a financially stable retirement.