The determination of profit distribution, a crucial aspect of financial management, involves a systematic process of allocating a portion of a company’s earnings to its employees. This allocation is typically based on pre-defined criteria, such as salary, performance, or a combination thereof. For example, a company may decide to distribute 10% of its annual net profit, with each employee receiving a share proportional to their individual salary.
The importance of this practice lies in its ability to motivate employees, fostering a sense of ownership and shared success within the organization. Historically, such profit-sharing schemes have been implemented to improve employee morale, reduce turnover, and ultimately, enhance overall productivity. Furthermore, these distributions can contribute significantly to an employee’s financial well-being and create a more equitable workplace.
The following sections will elaborate on the specific methodologies employed to accurately arrive at these profit distributions, detailing the key factors and considerations that underpin the entire process.
1. Net Profit Determination
Net Profit Determination is the foundational step in calculating profit distribution. Without an accurate assessment of the net profit, subsequent calculations become unreliable, potentially leading to inaccuracies in employee compensation and financial reporting.
-
Revenue Recognition
Revenue Recognition principles dictate when and how revenue is recorded. These principles, often governed by accounting standards, directly influence the net profit calculation. If revenue is prematurely or inaccurately recognized, the reported profit will be skewed, leading to incorrect profit distribution calculations. For example, recognizing revenue before the delivery of a service would inflate the net profit, potentially resulting in an over-distribution of profit shares to employees.
-
Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) Calculation
The cost of goods sold represents the direct costs attributable to the production of goods or services sold by a company. An accurate COGS calculation is crucial as it directly impacts the gross profit, which in turn affects the net profit. Understating COGS, for instance, by improperly valuing inventory, inflates the gross and net profit. This inflated profit would lead to a higher amount available for distribution, potentially creating discrepancies and financial strain if the excess distribution is not sustainable.
-
Operating Expense Management
Operating expenses encompass costs incurred during the normal course of business operations, such as salaries, rent, and utilities. Meticulous tracking and allocation of these expenses are paramount. Failure to properly account for operating expenses results in an overstatement of the net profit. Overstated profits might then lead to an unsustainable level of profit distribution, impacting the company’s long-term financial health. For example, misclassifying a capital expenditure as an operating expense would reduce net profit artificially.
-
Tax Liability Calculation
Accurately determining the tax liability is essential as it directly reduces the net profit available for distribution. Tax laws and regulations vary widely, and miscalculations can lead to legal repercussions and financial penalties. Failing to adequately account for deferred tax liabilities, for instance, could result in an inflated net profit figure that does not accurately reflect the company’s financial obligations, impacting the amount of profit legitimately available for distribution.
In essence, Net Profit Determination is the cornerstone upon which equitable profit distribution is built. Inaccurate revenue recognition, COGS calculation errors, mismanagement of operating expenses, or improper tax liability assessment will invariably lead to flawed calculations of profit distribution, negatively affecting both the companys financial stability and employee morale. Consistent adherence to sound accounting principles and regulatory compliance ensures the integrity of the entire process.
2. Eligible Employee Identification
The meticulous identification of eligible employees is a crucial pre-requisite for accurate profit distribution calculations. Without clearly defined eligibility criteria, the equitable allocation of profits becomes compromised, potentially leading to legal challenges and employee dissatisfaction.
-
Employment Status and Tenure
Eligibility often hinges on an employee’s status, such as full-time, part-time, or contractual. Additionally, a minimum tenure requirement is frequently imposed to ensure that profit distribution benefits long-term contributors to the organization. For instance, employees who have worked less than six months might be excluded. Incorrectly classifying an employees status or disregarding tenure requirements can lead to either the wrongful exclusion or inclusion of individuals in the profit-sharing scheme, directly impacting the accuracy of the distribution.
-
Performance Thresholds
Some organizations incorporate performance metrics into their eligibility criteria. Employees must meet or exceed pre-defined performance targets to qualify for profit distribution. This approach aligns profit-sharing with individual contributions to company success. For example, sales quotas, project completion rates, or customer satisfaction scores might be used as benchmarks. Improperly measured or unfairly applied performance thresholds can create disputes and undermine the intended motivational benefits of the profit-sharing program.
-
Compliance with Company Policies
Eligibility can be contingent upon adherence to company policies and ethical standards. Employees found to be in violation of these policies may be disqualified from receiving profit distributions. This reinforces ethical conduct and aligns profit-sharing with organizational values. Examples include violations of code of conduct, disciplinary actions, or any behavior considered detrimental to the company. Subjectivity or inconsistencies in applying these policies can, however, lead to perceived unfairness in the profit distribution process.
-
Collective Bargaining Agreements
In unionized environments, collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) often stipulate specific eligibility criteria for profit-sharing. These agreements outline the terms and conditions under which union members are entitled to participate. CBAs may supersede standard company policies regarding eligibility. Failure to adhere to CBA provisions regarding eligibility can result in legal challenges and strained labor relations, significantly impacting the smooth execution of profit distribution.
In conclusion, precise employee eligibility identification is a linchpin in ensuring equitable and legally sound profit distribution. Errors in assessing employment status, misapplication of performance thresholds, inconsistent enforcement of company policies, or disregard for collective bargaining agreements can all undermine the integrity of the process. Strict adherence to established criteria and transparent communication are vital for maintaining trust and fostering a positive workplace environment.
3. Allocation Method Selection
The selection of an appropriate allocation method is a critical determinant in accurately distributing profits, directly influencing how earnings are allocated amongst eligible employees. This choice is not arbitrary but rather a strategic decision rooted in company values, performance objectives, and legal considerations. The method selected dictates the fairness and perceived equity of the profit distribution process.
-
Salary-Based Allocation
Salary-based allocation distributes profits proportionally to each employee’s base salary. For instance, an employee earning twice the salary of another would receive twice the profit share, assuming equal eligibility. This method is simple to implement and understand but may not fully recognize individual performance differences. In the context of determining profit distribution, it emphasizes the value of each employee’s role within the organizational structure but may not incentivize exceptional performance beyond the requirements of the assigned role.
-
Performance-Based Allocation
Performance-based allocation distributes profits based on individual or team performance metrics. Key performance indicators (KPIs), project completion rates, or sales targets are common factors. A salesperson exceeding their quota by 20% might receive a higher allocation compared to someone who met their quota. This method aims to directly reward contributions to profitability but requires carefully designed metrics to avoid unintended consequences or gaming of the system. It directly links distribution to demonstrable results, incentivizing employees to exceed expectations.
-
Hybrid Allocation Models
Hybrid models combine elements of both salary-based and performance-based allocation. For example, a portion of the profit might be distributed proportionally to salary, while the remaining portion is distributed based on performance evaluations or metrics. Such hybrid allocations attempt to balance recognizing the value of each role with rewarding outstanding contributions. The specific weighting assigned to each factor is a strategic decision influencing employee motivation and perceived fairness.
-
Equal Distribution
Some organizations opt for an equal distribution of profits, regardless of salary or performance. This approach reflects a commitment to egalitarianism and may be suitable for organizations with a strong collaborative culture. All eligible employees receive the same amount. While simple to administer and conveying a message of inclusivity, this approach may not effectively incentivize high-achievers or recognize the relative value of different roles within the organization.
Ultimately, the choice of allocation method profoundly impacts how profits are divided. The ideal choice balances simplicity, perceived fairness, motivational impact, and alignment with organizational goals. An improper selection can lead to employee dissatisfaction and undermine the very purpose of sharing profits. Therefore, a thorough evaluation of the organizational context and goals is essential for selecting a suitable allocation method.
4. Salary Proportionality
Salary proportionality represents a direct and widely used method for allocating profits within an organization. Its connection to profit distribution is fundamental, as it establishes a clear and readily understood relationship between an employee’s earnings and their share of the company’s profits. This proportionality serves as a straightforward mechanism for determining individual profit allocations.
-
Base Salary as the Allocation Factor
The foundation of salary proportionality lies in using an employee’s base salary as the primary determinant of their profit share. Employees with higher salaries receive a larger portion of the profits, reflecting the perceived value of their role or contribution to the organization. For example, if a company allocates 10% of its net profit and an employee earns 5% of the total payroll, that employee receives 5% of the allocated profit. This approach is easily communicated and implemented, simplifying the calculation process. However, it may not adequately acknowledge individual performance or other non-salary related contributions.
-
Calculation Methodology
The calculation of profit share under salary proportionality involves a simple ratio. An individual’s salary is divided by the total payroll of eligible employees, and this ratio is then multiplied by the total profit allocated for distribution. This yields the individual employee’s profit share. This methodology ensures that the distribution is directly proportional to salary levels, making it transparent and predictable. Variations may include adjustments for part-time employees or those with less than a full year of service, further refining the proportionality.
-
Benefits and Drawbacks
Salary proportionality offers the benefit of simplicity and ease of administration, fostering transparency and employee understanding. However, its primary drawback is its failure to recognize individual performance or other factors contributing to the company’s success beyond one’s salary grade. High-performing employees in lower salary brackets may feel undervalued, while underperforming employees in higher salary brackets may receive a disproportionately large share. Therefore, its effectiveness is contingent upon the organization’s culture and the extent to which salary levels accurately reflect individual contributions.
-
Legal and Compliance Considerations
When implementing salary proportionality, it is essential to ensure compliance with all applicable labor laws and regulations. This includes adhering to minimum wage requirements, equal pay laws, and any specific regulations governing profit-sharing schemes. Accurate record-keeping and documentation are crucial for demonstrating compliance. In some jurisdictions, legal counsel may be needed to review the profit distribution plan and ensure that it does not inadvertently discriminate against any employee group.
In summary, salary proportionality offers a clear and straightforward approach to calculating profit distribution. While it excels in simplicity and ease of administration, its inherent limitation lies in its inability to account for individual performance or other non-salary related factors. Organizations must carefully weigh these benefits and drawbacks when determining whether salary proportionality aligns with their values and objectives.
5. Performance Metrics Integration
The integration of performance metrics into profit distribution calculations represents a move towards rewarding employees based on their direct contribution to a companys financial success. This approach seeks to align employee incentives with organizational goals, fostering a culture of accountability and high performance.
-
KPI-Based Allocation
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), such as sales targets, customer satisfaction scores, or project completion rates, serve as quantifiable measures of employee performance. A predefined formula links KPI achievement to profit share, wherein exceeding targets results in a proportionally larger allocation. For example, a sales team exceeding its quarterly target by 15% may receive a 20% increase in their profit share allocation. The selection of appropriate KPIs is paramount to ensure alignment with organizational objectives and avoid unintended consequences, such as incentivizing behaviors that negatively impact other areas of the business.
-
Performance Evaluation Systems
Performance evaluation systems, often involving regular reviews and feedback, can be integrated into profit distribution calculations. Employees receiving higher performance ratings, such as “exceeds expectations,” receive a larger profit share allocation compared to those rated lower. This method relies on subjective assessments of employee performance, introducing the potential for bias or inconsistency. Clear evaluation criteria and transparent review processes are essential to mitigate these risks and ensure fairness in the distribution process.
-
Team-Based Performance Metrics
In collaborative environments, profit distribution may be tied to team-based performance metrics. The success of a project team, measured by metrics such as on-time delivery or budget adherence, determines the profit share allocated to the team members. This approach fosters teamwork and shared accountability but requires careful consideration of individual contributions within the team. Ensuring that each team member’s individual efforts are appropriately recognized and rewarded is critical to maintaining motivation and avoiding free-rider problems.
-
Balanced Scorecard Approach
The balanced scorecard is a strategic performance management tool that incorporates a variety of financial and non-financial metrics to assess organizational performance. By tying profit distribution to the achievement of balanced scorecard objectives, companies can incentivize employees to focus on a holistic set of strategic priorities. This approach ensures that employees are not solely focused on short-term financial gains but also consider factors such as customer satisfaction, internal process efficiency, and innovation. It necessitates a comprehensive and well-defined balanced scorecard with clearly articulated objectives and metrics.
Integrating performance metrics into profit distribution calculations represents a strategic alignment of employee incentives and organizational goals. The selected metrics and allocation methods must be carefully chosen to ensure fairness, transparency, and a demonstrable link between performance and reward. When implemented effectively, this approach can drive improved employee engagement, increased productivity, and enhanced overall organizational performance, directly impacting the equitable distribution of profits.
6. Legal Compliance Adherence
Legal compliance adherence is inextricably linked to the accurate calculation of profit distributions. The lawful and equitable distribution of profits necessitates strict adherence to relevant labor laws, tax regulations, and any other applicable legal mandates. Failure to comply with these regulations can result in significant financial penalties, legal challenges, and reputational damage for the organization. For instance, misclassifying employees as independent contractors to avoid paying payroll taxes directly impacts the net profit available for distribution and constitutes a legal violation.
Furthermore, adherence to legal requirements extends to the establishment of transparent and non-discriminatory profit distribution plans. Regulations governing equal pay and non-discrimination must be carefully considered to ensure that the profit distribution plan does not disproportionately benefit or disadvantage any protected employee group. An example would be a profit-sharing plan that implicitly favors male employees over female employees, leading to claims of gender discrimination. Properly structured and documented profit distribution plans, reviewed by legal counsel, are essential for mitigating such risks. The Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) in the US sets specific standards for certain deferred profit-sharing plans and is therefore a key compliance element in many organizational cases.
In conclusion, legal compliance adherence is not merely an ancillary consideration but an integral component of the process of calculating and distributing profits. Thorough understanding and implementation of relevant regulations are paramount for ensuring fairness, avoiding legal repercussions, and maintaining the integrity of the organization. Ignoring these considerations can lead to severe consequences, underscoring the practical significance of integrating legal compliance into every aspect of the profit distribution process. In many Jurisdictions this profit distribution is mandatory and disregarding such laws will lead to legal action.
7. Tax Implications Consideration
The consideration of tax implications is intrinsically linked to profit distribution calculations. Profit distribution, from both the employer’s and the employee’s perspectives, is subject to taxation. Therefore, the precise amount available for distribution, and the subsequent amount received by employees, is directly affected by prevailing tax laws and regulations. For instance, employer contributions to a profit-sharing plan may be tax-deductible, reducing the company’s taxable income, but distributions to employees are generally taxable as income. The calculation must therefore account for these factors to ensure legal compliance and accurate financial reporting. Failure to do so results in inaccurate statements and legal complications, leading to penalties and revisions. Consider also the impact of social security contributions which depend greatly on government laws and jurisdictions.
Furthermore, different types of profit distribution plans have varying tax implications. A cash-based plan, where employees receive their share in cash, is subject to immediate income tax and potentially payroll taxes. Deferred profit-sharing plans, such as those qualified under section 401(k) in the United States, offer tax advantages by deferring taxation until retirement, although contributions are still subject to contribution limits. The choice of plan impacts the timing and extent of tax liabilities for both employer and employee. An important calculation factor is the knowledge of tax bands, which can vary depending on the employee, state and country in which this distribution is made. Failing to understand the impact of different types of plans makes for poor planning and poor communication.
In conclusion, neglecting tax implications consideration when calculating profit distributions leads to inaccurate estimations of distributable amounts, potential non-compliance with tax laws, and financial penalties. A comprehensive understanding of these tax implications, including the impact of various plan types and relevant regulations, is essential for businesses seeking to distribute profits fairly and lawfully. The accurate integration of these tax considerations is not merely a procedural step; it directly impacts the financial well-being of both the company and its employees. To best practice in the case of Tax Implications a professional team and professional consultation is key for success.
8. Distribution Schedule Establishment
The establishment of a distribution schedule is a critical phase that directly complements profit distribution calculations. The scheduling process ensures that the calculated profit shares are disbursed to eligible employees in a timely and organized manner. A well-defined distribution schedule provides clarity and predictability, fostering trust and transparency in the overall profit-sharing system.
-
Frequency of Distribution
The frequency of distributionwhether annually, semi-annually, or quarterlydirectly influences employee perception and financial planning. For example, an annual distribution provides a lump-sum benefit that can be used for larger financial goals, while more frequent distributions provide regular income supplements. The chosen frequency must align with both the company’s financial capabilities and employee needs, balancing the administrative burden with the motivational impact of regular payouts. Different calculations are associated with different payout frequency and this must be adhered to when performing the core calculations.
-
Timeline for Calculation and Payment
A clear timeline outlining the steps involved in calculating the profit shares and processing payments is essential. This timeline should specify deadlines for financial reporting, eligibility verification, calculation review, and payment disbursement. For instance, the timeline may specify that calculations are finalized within two months of the fiscal year-end, with payments made within one month thereafter. A compressed timeline increases administrative burden, and can lead to errors if not efficiently managed. These calculations must be accurate as payment cycles and the entire procedure relies on precision. A transparent timeline allows Employees to plan their payments with certainty, but relies heavily on the accuracy and timely submission and calculations.
-
Communication Protocol
A communication protocol details how and when employees will be informed about the distribution schedule and their individual profit shares. Transparency is important, so employees should understand both calculation methods and the timeline. This communication protocol typically involves announcements via email, company meetings, or individual statements. Detailed communication ensures employees are well-informed about timelines and calculations. Without transparent communication channels, employees can mistrust the organization, and the methods used to distribute profits. Clear communication protocol can be implemented via a range of mediums such as Email, Corporate news updates or even one-to-one manager meetings.
-
Payment Methodologies
Payment methodologies must be established in conjunction with calculations and timelines, ensuring all information is transferred efficiently. For example, if payment is conducted via bank transfer, correct and timely transfer of employee bank details must be made. Also if a payment is made by cheque, this requires postal processing, and therefore timelines and calculation must consider this. The selected payment methodologies should align with internal process to ensure maximum precision.
The establishment of a carefully considered distribution schedule, aligned with the methods of calculating profit distributions, ensures a transparent and reliable profit-sharing system. By clearly defining the frequency, timeline, communication protocol, and payment methods, organizations can foster trust and incentivize employees, ultimately driving improved performance and stronger employee engagement. Each payment method has variables which must be considered when producing the schedule.
9. Communication Transparency
Communication transparency, in the context of profit distribution calculations, is an essential component for fostering employee trust and ensuring equitable financial management within an organization. It entails openly disseminating information regarding the methodology, results, and rationale behind the profit distribution process.
-
Methodology Disclosure
Detailed explanation of the formula used to calculate individual profit shares is crucial. This explanation must include the factors considered, such as salary, performance metrics, or tenure, and their respective weighting. For example, disclosing that 60% of the profit share is based on salary and 40% on performance metrics provides employees with insight into how their share is determined. Omission of these important details makes for mistrust and negative impacts for company moral. If methodology disclosure is well known then disputes will be more manageable and simpler.
-
Result Explanation
Providing employees with a clear breakdown of their individual profit share calculation enhances understanding and reduces ambiguity. A statement outlining their base salary, performance rating, applicable profit-sharing percentage, and resulting profit share amount is necessary. For example, a statement indicating that an employee with a salary of $50,000, a performance rating of “exceeds expectations,” and a profit-sharing percentage of 5% receives a profit share of $2,500 promotes transparency. In the absence of such explanations, any disputes will be difficult to understand and therefore even more difficult to reach agreement and suitable closure.
-
Rationale Provision
Clearly articulating the rationale behind the profit distribution plan and any subsequent adjustments reinforces fairness and equity. Explaining the strategic goals of the profit-sharing program, its alignment with company values, and any changes implemented over time promotes understanding and acceptance. An example is justifying the inclusion of specific performance metrics as reflecting the strategic priorities of the organization. Lack of rationale often suggests unorganized practices and this can lead to more employees being disengaged. Any new rationale must be transparently communicated to maximize employee satisfaction.
-
Accessibility of Information
Ensuring that all relevant documentation, including the profit distribution plan, calculation methodology, and individual statements, is readily accessible to employees reinforces transparency and accountability. Providing a centralized repository, such as an intranet page or HR portal, allows employees to access the information they need. For example, posting the profit distribution plan and calculation methodology on the company intranet ensures that all employees have equal access to this information. All employees must have equal and ease access, with equal levels of help for understanding any documents.
Effective communication transparency serves as a cornerstone for building trust and fostering a positive work environment. By openly sharing information regarding the profit distribution methodology, results, rationale, and ensuring information accessibility, organizations can promote a sense of fairness and equity among employees, leading to improved engagement, increased productivity, and stronger overall performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following questions and answers address common inquiries regarding the calculation of profit distributions, providing clarity on the processes and factors involved.
Question 1: What constitutes net profit for profit distribution purposes?
Net profit, for distribution purposes, represents the company’s earnings after all expenses, including operating costs, taxes, and interest, have been deducted from total revenue. This figure, often derived from the company’s audited financial statements, forms the basis for calculating the total amount available for profit sharing.
Question 2: Who determines employee eligibility for profit distribution?
Eligibility criteria are typically defined by company policy, often outlined in employee handbooks or employment contracts. Factors such as employment status (full-time, part-time), tenure, and adherence to company policies may determine an employee’s eligibility to participate in profit sharing.
Question 3: How is the allocation method chosen for profit distribution?
The selection of an allocation method is a strategic decision made by company management, often in consultation with legal and financial advisors. Factors considered include company culture, performance objectives, and alignment with legal and regulatory requirements. Common methods include salary-based allocation, performance-based allocation, and hybrid models.
Question 4: What role do performance metrics play in profit distribution calculations?
Performance metrics serve as quantifiable measures of individual or team contributions to company success. These metrics, such as sales targets, customer satisfaction scores, or project completion rates, may be integrated into the profit distribution calculation to reward high-performing employees and align incentives with organizational goals.
Question 5: How are tax implications considered in profit distribution calculations?
Tax implications are a critical consideration, as profit distributions are typically subject to income tax and potentially payroll taxes. The calculation must account for these taxes to ensure compliance with relevant tax laws and regulations. Both the employer and employee have tax liabilities associated with profit distribution.
Question 6: What recourse is available if an employee disputes their profit distribution calculation?
Employees who dispute their profit distribution calculation should first consult with their HR department or designated point of contact within the company. The company should have a clearly defined process for addressing employee concerns and resolving disputes. This may involve providing detailed documentation and explanation of the calculation methodology.
In summary, understanding the nuances of profit distribution calculations is crucial for both employers and employees. Clear policies, transparent communication, and adherence to legal and regulatory requirements are essential for ensuring equitable and compliant profit-sharing practices.
The subsequent sections will delve into the practical considerations for implementing and managing a profit distribution program.
Practical Tips for Accurate Profit Distribution Calculations
To ensure the integrity and fairness of the process, precise and transparent methods are paramount when engaging in profit distribution calculations.
Tip 1: Implement robust accounting practices to guarantee accurate net profit determination. Maintaining meticulous records of revenue, expenses, and tax liabilities is crucial for a reliable basis. Regular audits and reconciliations should be undertaken.
Tip 2: Establish clear and well-defined eligibility criteria for employees. This includes specifying minimum tenure requirements, employment status definitions, and any performance thresholds. Adherence to these criteria must be consistent and non-discriminatory.
Tip 3: Select an allocation method that aligns with organizational goals and values. Consider salary-based, performance-based, or hybrid models, carefully weighing the benefits and drawbacks of each in relation to the company culture.
Tip 4: Prioritize transparency in communication with employees. Clearly articulate the calculation methodology, distribution schedule, and rationale behind the profit-sharing plan. Readily provide individual statements outlining the components of each employee’s profit share.
Tip 5: Ensure compliance with all applicable labor laws and tax regulations. Consult with legal and financial professionals to ensure adherence to all pertinent rules, including those related to equal pay, non-discrimination, and tax withholdings.
Tip 6: Automate the calculation process where feasible, leveraging specialized software or tools to minimize errors and enhance efficiency. Ensure that the selected tools are adaptable to changes in company policies or regulatory requirements.
Tip 7: Regularly review and update the profit distribution plan to reflect changes in the business environment, organizational priorities, and legal landscape. Solicit feedback from employees and stakeholders to identify areas for improvement.
Adhering to these recommendations contributes to a more accurate, equitable, and legally sound profit distribution process, ultimately fostering employee trust and organizational success.
These tips aim to provide tangible guidance for successfully executing an organizational profit distribution plan.
Conclusion
This exploration of how como se calculan las utilidades has illuminated the intricate process involved in determining and distributing company profits to employees. Key elements such as net profit determination, employee eligibility, allocation method selection, and legal compliance were underscored as critical to ensuring a fair and accurate process. Further, the integration of performance metrics, consideration of tax implications, establishment of a structured distribution schedule, and prioritization of transparent communication were identified as pivotal best practices.
The systematic application of these principles not only fosters employee trust and promotes a positive work environment but also contributes to the long-term financial health and sustainability of the organization. Therefore, a diligent and well-informed approach to calculating and distributing profit is of utmost importance for both employers and employees. Continued vigilance and proactive adaptation to evolving legal and economic landscapes remain essential for maintaining the integrity of como se calculan las utilidades.
