A damage per second assessment tool designed for Path of Exile 2 enables players to quantify the theoretical damage output of their character builds. This assessment considers factors such as skill selection, equipment attributes, passive skill tree allocations, and various buffs or debuffs. As an illustration, one might utilize such a tool to compare the expected damage of a build using a two-handed sword versus one employing dual-wielded daggers, considering all relevant modifiers.
These tools offer significant value by facilitating informed decision-making during character progression. By accurately projecting the impact of gear upgrades, skill modifications, or passive tree adjustments on overall damage potential, players can optimize their builds for maximum effectiveness. Historically, manual calculations were cumbersome and prone to error; the introduction of automated tools streamlined the process and allowed for more in-depth analysis.
Understanding the principles behind damage calculation and the utilization of assessment tools is crucial for maximizing character efficiency. Further exploration will delve into specific functionalities, commonly used metrics, and best practices for interpreting the data provided. This understanding will help navigate complex build choices.
1. Build Optimization
Build optimization is intrinsically linked to damage per second assessment in Path of Exile 2. The damage projection tool serves as a critical feedback mechanism, directly influencing the iterative process of improving a character’s offensive capabilities. Any adjustment to the build, be it a change in skill selection, passive tree configuration, or equipment, has a quantifiable effect on the projected damage output, as determined by the assessment tool. For example, if a player is considering allocating additional passive points into critical strike chance, the assessment tool allows for a direct comparison of the damage increase versus alternative investments, facilitating a data-driven approach to build refinement. Without this quantifiable feedback, optimization becomes significantly more challenging, relying more on intuition than empirical data.
The effective employment of damage assessment in build optimization extends beyond simply maximizing the damage figure displayed. It also entails analyzing the conditions under which that damage is achieved. Factors such as attack speed, mana sustain, and enemy defenses play a critical role in translating theoretical damage into practical effectiveness. A build exhibiting high damage when targeting stationary, undefended targets might perform poorly against highly mobile or heavily armored foes. Therefore, utilizing the assessment tool in conjunction with in-game testing is paramount. This ensures the optimized build functions efficiently under a variety of combat scenarios, mitigating the limitations of purely theoretical projections.
In conclusion, effective build optimization in Path of Exile 2 relies heavily on the data provided by damage assessment tools. It enables informed decision-making, facilitating efficient allocation of resources and strategic skill choices. While the tool offers valuable insights, its limitations must be acknowledged. The most effective approach combines theoretical projections with practical application, ensuring that the final build is not only capable of dealing substantial damage but also capable of reliably delivering that damage in diverse combat environments.
2. Gear Evaluation
Gear evaluation forms an integral component within the damage per second assessment framework in Path of Exile 2. The efficacy of a characters equipment directly influences its offensive potential; therefore, a comprehensive analysis of gear attributes is paramount for accurate damage projection. For instance, a weapons base damage, attack speed, critical strike chance, and inherent modifiers (e.g., added elemental damage) contribute significantly to the overall calculated damage output. Consequently, any damage projection tool must incorporate these factors to generate reliable estimations. The tool serves as a benchmark for comparing the relative advantages of different equipment configurations, allowing players to identify potential upgrades or assess the impact of modifying existing items (e.g., via crafting or enchantment). This understanding is crucial for efficient resource allocation and targeted gear acquisition.
The process of gear evaluation extends beyond simply considering raw damage values. Synergies between equipment affixes and character skills must also be accounted for. For example, a piece of armor with increased elemental resistance might not directly contribute to damage output. However, by enabling the character to withstand elemental attacks more effectively, it frees up resources for offensive investments, ultimately enhancing overall damage dealing capacity. The assessment tool facilitates this holistic evaluation by allowing players to simulate the impact of various defensive attributes on damage output indirectly. Furthermore, complex interactions between gear modifiers (e.g., increased damage versus specific enemy types) are typically difficult to assess manually. The damage projection tool automates this process, providing a nuanced understanding of gears contributions within diverse combat scenarios.
In summary, gear evaluation and damage per second assessment are intrinsically linked in Path of Exile 2. The assessment tool provides a quantitative framework for evaluating the impact of various equipment configurations on overall offensive potential. By considering both direct damage contributions and synergistic effects, players can make informed decisions regarding gear acquisition, modification, and build optimization. This understanding is essential for maximizing character efficiency and progressing through increasingly challenging content. Challenges arise in accurately modeling complex item interactions and simulating diverse combat environments; however, continual refinement of these tools enhances their predictive accuracy.
3. Skill Synergy
Skill synergy represents a critical element when assessing damage per second in Path of Exile 2. The theoretical damage output of individual skills, as calculated by any damage projection tool, often deviates significantly from actual performance due to interactions with other skills and character attributes.
-
Buff Application & Stacking
Certain skills apply buffs to the character or debuffs to the enemy, enhancing damage dealt by subsequent skills. The damage increase is often multiplicative, leading to significant amplifications when several synergistic buffs are stacked. A damage projection tool must accurately model these interactions to provide a realistic damage estimate. Failure to account for these multiplicative buffs results in a gross underestimation of the builds true potential. For example, a skill that increases critical strike chance, when combined with a skill that deals increased damage on critical strikes, results in an exponential increase in damage that a simple damage calculation would miss.
-
Triggering & Sequencing
Path of Exile 2 allows skills to trigger other skills, creating complex sequences. Damage projection tools must simulate the execution order and frequency of triggered skills. The timing between triggered skills can significantly affect the overall damage output. A poorly-timed sequence may result in a bottleneck, reducing the overall damage delivered per second. The tool must account for potential cooldowns and resource limitations. An example includes a skill that automatically casts a linked spell upon hitting an enemy with a melee attack. Properly sequencing and scaling these triggered skills necessitates accurate assessment of the resulting damage chain.
-
Conversion and Scaling
Skills can convert damage types, for example, converting physical damage to elemental damage. This conversion affects damage scaling due to varying resistances and damage modifiers that apply to different damage types. A tool should model the interaction between damage conversion and corresponding modifiers to project accurate damage. Converting a substantial amount of physical damage to fire and then scaling fire damage can lead to significantly more potent builds compared to solely scaling physical damage. Proper projection requires accounting for enemy resistances and potential penetration effects related to the converted damage type.
-
Ailment Application
Many skills apply ailments such as poison, ignite, or bleed. These ailments inflict damage over time, which contributes significantly to the total damage output of the build. The effectiveness of these ailments depends on factors such as ailment duration, ailment stacking, and enemy resistance. Damage projection tools must accurately simulate these factors to determine the contribution of ailments to overall damage. Ailment-based builds often rely on a combination of initial hit damage and subsequent ailment damage. The tool must project both values and account for ailment-specific scaling mechanics.
By comprehensively modeling these facets of skill synergy, a damage projection tool can provide a far more accurate representation of a build’s potential damage per second. This granular analysis enables informed decision-making during character progression and build optimization. Accurate damage projection allows players to effectively prioritize skills that exhibit strong synergy and maximize their overall offensive capabilities.
4. Passive Allocations
Passive skill allocations represent a foundational element in defining a character’s capabilities within Path of Exile 2. The distribution of passive points on the extensive skill tree profoundly influences both offensive and defensive characteristics, thereby directly impacting the damage per second projection derived from assessment tools.
-
Damage Nodes & Multipliers
Allocation of passive points towards nodes that grant increased damage, attack speed, cast speed, or critical strike chance directly augments damage output. Multiplicative damage modifiers within the passive tree introduce further complexity, as their effect scales with existing sources of damage. For instance, allocating points into elemental damage nodes benefits builds reliant on elemental skills, while points invested in weapon-specific damage nodes enhance the effectiveness of specific weapon types. Assessment tools must accurately account for these multiplicative effects to provide realistic damage projections.
-
Attribute Thresholds & Scaling
Certain passive nodes grant additional bonuses based on a character’s attribute levels (Strength, Dexterity, Intelligence). These attribute thresholds unlock access to powerful scaling effects that can significantly boost damage output. For example, a passive node might grant increased critical strike chance per point of Dexterity above a certain threshold. Assessment tools must consider the dynamic relationship between attribute allocation and the resulting damage bonuses to provide accurate simulations.
-
Keystone Passives & Build Archetypes
Keystone passives fundamentally alter character mechanics and often dictate the overall playstyle and damage scaling strategy. Some Keystones may significantly amplify damage potential at the cost of defensive capabilities, while others may enable unique damage scaling interactions. For example, the “Akimbo” keystone may drastically alter the base damage scaling for dual wielding characters. A damage projection tool must accurately model these keystone-induced alterations to provide meaningful assessments of different build archetypes.
-
Resource Efficiency & Sustain
Efficient management of resources such as mana or life is crucial for sustained damage output. Passive allocations that enhance resource regeneration, reduce resource costs, or grant alternative resource sustain mechanisms indirectly impact damage per second by ensuring continuous skill usage. For instance, allocating points to mana regeneration nodes may be essential for maintaining sustained damage output with mana-intensive skills. Assessment tools should consider the interplay between resource management and skill usage to provide a comprehensive damage evaluation.
In essence, passive allocations serve as the blueprint for character development, determining the core strengths and weaknesses that define damage potential. Accurate damage projection necessitates a meticulous consideration of the various factors influenced by the passive skill tree, including damage multipliers, attribute scaling, keystone effects, and resource management. The effective utilization of assessment tools in conjunction with thoughtful passive allocations enables informed decision-making during character progression, allowing for optimal build configuration and maximized damage output.
5. Buff/Debuff Impact
The influence of buffs and debuffs represents a significant variable within the damage per second assessment framework. The application of beneficial effects (buffs) to a character and detrimental effects (debuffs) to enemies directly modulates damage output. Therefore, the accurate modeling of these effects is crucial for generating reliable damage projections.
-
Additive Buffs & Debuffs
Certain buffs and debuffs grant additive increases or reductions to damage values. Examples include flat damage increases or reductions to enemy armor. While seemingly straightforward, the accurate incorporation of additive modifiers requires careful consideration of base damage values and the sequence of calculations. The assessment tool must correctly apply these additive values before multiplicative modifiers to ensure accurate results. Overlooking the precise application order will lead to a skewed representation of damage potential.
-
Multiplicative Buffs & Debuffs
Multiplicative buffs and debuffs provide percentage-based increases or reductions to damage. These modifiers exert a significantly more substantial influence on overall damage output compared to additive modifiers, particularly when stacked. Accurately modeling multiplicative effects is essential for predicting the performance of builds that rely on stacking buffs or debuffs. The tool must differentiate between various sources of multiplicative scaling and apply them correctly to avoid over- or underestimation of damage.
-
Conditional Buffs & Debuffs
Many buffs and debuffs are contingent upon specific conditions, such as enemy proximity, player health, or skill activation. These conditional effects necessitate accurate tracking of game state and dynamic adjustments to damage calculations. For example, a buff that grants increased damage when the character is at low health requires the assessment tool to simulate low-health scenarios to accurately gauge its impact. Failure to account for these conditional dependencies will result in inaccurate damage projections under specific circumstances.
-
Aura & Area Effects
Auras and area-of-effect skills can provide persistent buffs to allies or debuffs to enemies within a defined radius. Accurately modeling these effects requires considering the range, duration, and overlap of the aura or area of effect. The tool must simulate the presence of allies and enemies within the area to correctly apply the buffs or debuffs. This becomes particularly relevant in group play scenarios, where the cumulative effect of multiple auras can significantly alter damage output.
The accurate simulation of buff and debuff interactions is indispensable for generating reliable damage per second projections. These effects can dramatically alter damage output, and failure to account for them will lead to misleading assessments. The complexity of buff and debuff mechanics necessitates a robust modeling approach within the assessment framework, accounting for additive, multiplicative, conditional, and area-based effects.
6. Damage Type Scaling
Damage type scaling represents a fundamental aspect of character building in Path of Exile 2, directly influencing the effectiveness of different damage types. Accurate damage per second projection hinges on understanding and correctly modeling how each damage type scales with various stats, modifiers, and enemy resistances. Without a comprehensive understanding of damage type scaling, assessments of damage potential become unreliable and can lead to suboptimal character builds.
-
Physical Damage Scaling
Physical damage typically scales with weapon damage, strength, and percentage increases to physical damage. It is also significantly affected by enemy armor, which reduces the incoming physical damage. Accurately estimating damage output with physical damage requires modeling enemy armor values and accounting for armor penetration effects. For example, a skill that grants a percentage increase to physical damage will have a diminishing return against heavily armored enemies. Assessment tools need to incorporate these factors to provide realistic damage projections for physical damage-based builds.
-
Elemental Damage Scaling
Elemental damage, encompassing fire, cold, and lightning, scales with percentage increases to elemental damage, specific elemental skill modifiers, and attribute scaling (such as intelligence for certain lightning skills). Enemy elemental resistances play a critical role in mitigating elemental damage. Projecting elemental damage output requires accurate modeling of enemy resistance values, resistance penetration effects, and the potential for applying elemental ailments like ignite, freeze, or shock. For instance, a fire-based build relying on ignite damage needs to account for enemy fire resistance and the effectiveness of ignite application to accurately assess damage.
-
Chaos Damage Scaling
Chaos damage bypasses energy shield and directly damages life. It scales with percentage increases to chaos damage and skill-specific modifiers. While fewer enemies possess significant chaos resistance, it is still a factor that must be considered in damage calculations. Some passive skills and equipment provide bonuses to chaos damage or chaos resistance penetration. Accurately projecting chaos damage involves accounting for these modifiers and the relatively lower, but still present, chaos resistance found on certain enemy types. Effective scaling often involves increasing the duration of chaos damage over time effects.
-
Damage over Time Scaling
Damage over time (DoT) effects, such as poison, bleed, and ignite, scale differently than hit-based damage. They are often influenced by duration, ailment stacking mechanics, and specific modifiers that enhance their damage output. Accurately modeling DoT damage requires understanding how these ailments interact with enemy resistances and the potential for applying multiple stacks of the same ailment. For example, a poison build might focus on increasing poison duration and stacking multiple instances of poison to maximize damage output. The damage projection tool needs to simulate these stacking mechanics and account for enemy mitigation of DoT effects.
In conclusion, damage type scaling is intrinsically linked to effective utilization. The reliability of damage estimates derived from these tools depends directly on the accuracy with which they model the unique scaling characteristics of each damage type. By considering factors such as enemy resistances, attribute scaling, and ailment application, damage assessment tools can provide valuable insights into the damage potential of different build configurations, facilitating informed decision-making during character progression. A failure to account for these nuances renders the assessments unreliable.
7. Enemy Resistances
Enemy resistances constitute a critical variable in the accurate assessment of damage output, significantly influencing the projections derived from any damage per second assessment tool. Understanding enemy resistances is paramount for effective character building and build optimization.
-
Elemental Resistances
Elemental resistances, encompassing fire, cold, and lightning, directly reduce the damage inflicted by corresponding elemental attacks. The magnitude of resistance varies significantly among different enemy types. Failure to accurately account for these resistances results in a significant overestimation of elemental damage potential. For example, a creature with 50% fire resistance will only receive half the intended fire damage. Any damage projection tool must incorporate enemy resistance values to provide realistic damage estimates. This becomes particularly crucial in endgame content where enemies often possess high resistances.
-
Chaos Resistance
Chaos resistance mitigates damage inflicted by chaos-based attacks. While generally lower than elemental resistances across the enemy spectrum, chaos resistance remains a relevant factor, particularly against specific enemy types or in encounters involving chaos damage amplification. The assessment tool must accurately model chaos resistance values to project the true damage potential of chaos-based builds. Inaccuracies in chaos resistance modeling lead to skewed projections and potentially suboptimal build choices.
-
Physical Damage Reduction
Physical damage reduction, often represented by armor, reduces the amount of physical damage taken. Unlike elemental and chaos resistances, armor provides a non-linear reduction in damage, with diminishing returns as the physical damage value increases. Projecting physical damage output requires accurate modeling of enemy armor values and armor penetration effects. A damage assessment tool must account for the complex interaction between physical damage, armor, and penetration to provide reliable projections. A simplistic linear model will yield inaccurate results, especially against high-armor targets.
-
Resistance Penetration and Reduction
Resistance penetration and reduction mechanics allow players to bypass or lower enemy resistances, thereby increasing their damage output. These mechanics can be applied through skills, passive skills, or equipment affixes. Accurate modeling of resistance penetration and reduction effects is crucial for projecting the true damage potential of builds that rely on these mechanics. The assessment tool must correctly apply penetration and reduction values to enemy resistances before calculating damage. Failure to do so results in an underestimation of damage potential, particularly against resistant enemies.
The integration of accurate enemy resistance data is essential for the practical application of damage assessment tools. Overlooking or inaccurately modeling enemy resistances skews damage projections, potentially leading to suboptimal character builds and inefficient resource allocation. Consideration of these factors enhances the predictive power of these tools.
8. Attack/Cast Speed
Attack speed and cast speed are fundamental determinants of damage per second. These attributes dictate the frequency with which a character can execute attacks or cast spells, thereby directly influencing the total damage output over a given period. An accurate assessment of damage potential necessitates a precise quantification of attack or cast speed, as it serves as a multiplier for the base damage of individual skills. For example, a character with a skill dealing 100 base damage at an attack speed of 2 attacks per second will, theoretically, inflict 200 damage per second. Altering the attack speed to 3 attacks per second increases the projected damage to 300 per second, demonstrating the linear relationship between attack speed and damage output, assuming all other factors remain constant.
The interaction between attack/cast speed and other damage-enhancing modifiers complicates damage projection. Critical strike chance, critical strike multiplier, and various damage amplification effects are all predicated on the frequency of attacks or casts. A build maximizing critical strike chance, but possessing low attack speed, will realize only a fraction of its potential damage output. Conversely, a build with high attack speed but insufficient critical strike investment may be limited by the relatively low damage dealt per individual hit. Therefore, an assessment tool must integrate these interdependent factors to provide a comprehensive evaluation of damage potential. Such evaluation includes simulating attack or cast sequences over a sufficient duration to account for statistical variations in critical strike occurrence and ailment application.
In summary, attack speed and cast speed are inextricably linked to damage per second calculations. These attributes serve as a critical component in determining the rate at which damage is applied, directly affecting overall offensive capability. Accurate modeling of attack/cast speed within assessment tools, in conjunction with other damage modifiers, is essential for informed decision-making during character building and build optimization. Ignoring the influence of attack/cast speed, or inaccurately quantifying its effect, will lead to misleading damage projections and potentially suboptimal character development.
9. Critical Strike Chance
Critical strike chance, as a core attribute, exerts a significant influence on the damage per second projections calculated by damage assessment tools. This attribute determines the probability of an attack or spell inflicting increased damage, often referred to as a critical strike. The higher the critical strike chance, the more frequently critical strikes occur, leading to a proportional increase in overall damage output. A damage assessment tool must, therefore, accurately incorporate critical strike chance values to generate realistic damage projections. For example, a character with a 50% critical strike chance will, on average, inflict critical damage on half of its attacks, thereby increasing its overall damage output beyond the base damage of individual attacks. A tool failing to account for this will provide an underestimation of damage.
The interaction between critical strike chance and critical strike multiplier further complicates damage assessment. Critical strike multiplier dictates the magnitude of the damage increase inflicted by a critical strike. A higher critical strike multiplier, combined with a reasonable critical strike chance, results in substantial bursts of damage, elevating the overall damage per second. Consider a scenario where a character has a 40% critical strike chance and a 300% critical strike multiplier. The tool must calculate the average damage increase resulting from these critical strikes to project overall effectiveness. Without considering both attributes, assessment is inaccurate. Furthermore, some skills and passive abilities provide bonuses based on critical strikes, such as applying ailments or triggering additional effects. The assessment tool must account for these interactions to fully capture the impact of critical strike chance on damage.
In conclusion, critical strike chance serves as an integral component in damage per second calculations. Damage assessment tools must accurately model critical strike chance, alongside related attributes such as critical strike multiplier, to provide reliable projections of damage potential. A comprehensive understanding of critical strike mechanics, and their accurate representation within damage assessment frameworks, is essential for effective character building and optimized damage output. Accurate evaluation is crucial for efficient gameplay.
Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Damage Per Second Assessment Tools
The following section addresses common queries concerning the function, accuracy, and appropriate use of damage per second assessment tools for Path of Exile 2. The answers provided aim to clarify potential misunderstandings and promote informed application of these tools.
Question 1: What is the primary function of a damage per second assessment tool in the context of Path of Exile 2?
The primary function is to provide a quantifiable estimate of a character’s theoretical damage output. This projection aids in evaluating the effectiveness of different skill combinations, equipment configurations, and passive skill tree allocations. It serves as a decision-making aid during character progression.
Question 2: How accurately do damage per second assessment tools reflect actual in-game performance?
The accuracy varies depending on the sophistication of the tool and the completeness of its data. While these tools can provide a useful approximation, they often fail to account for all variables present in real-world combat scenarios. Factors such as enemy behavior, latency, and unforeseen skill interactions can influence actual damage output.
Question 3: What factors commonly contribute to discrepancies between projected and actual damage output?
Common discrepancies stem from simplifications in the tool’s calculations, incomplete data on enemy resistances or behaviors, and the inherent randomness present in certain game mechanics. Additionally, the tool’s inability to fully simulate player skill and positioning can contribute to variations between projected and actual damage.
Question 4: Can damage per second assessment tools be used to compare different character builds effectively?
Yes, when used judiciously. They provide a standardized framework for comparing the theoretical potential of different builds. However, reliance on a single metric is not advised. A comprehensive evaluation also requires considering factors such as survivability, resource management, and playstyle preferences.
Question 5: How frequently should a damage per second assessment tool be consulted during character progression?
Regular consultation is advisable, particularly after significant changes to equipment, skill selection, or passive tree allocations. Frequent assessment allows for ongoing optimization and identification of potential weaknesses in the build.
Question 6: Are all damage per second assessment tools equally reliable?
No. The reliability of these tools depends on the data sources, the complexity of their calculations, and the diligence of their developers. It is essential to critically evaluate the tool’s methodology and consult multiple sources to validate its projections.
In summary, damage per second assessment tools can be valuable aids in Path of Exile 2, but their projections should not be considered definitive. These are tools to enhance insight, not replace strategic observation.
Strategic Utilization of Damage Assessment Tools
The following guidelines aim to facilitate the effective employment of damage assessment methodologies in Path of Exile 2. These suggestions emphasize the importance of critical evaluation and contextual awareness when interpreting damage projections.
Tip 1: Critically Evaluate Input Parameters: Ensure the accuracy of all input values provided to the damage projection tool. Inputting incorrect values, such as inaccurate skill levels or equipment modifiers, will lead to skewed and unreliable results. Verification of data is paramount.
Tip 2: Consider Enemy Type Variations: Acknowledge the existence of diverse enemy types possessing varying resistances and defensive attributes. A damage projection optimized for one enemy type may perform suboptimally against another. Adapt damage assessments to reflect the specific challenges posed by different encounters.
Tip 3: Account for Ailment Application Probabilities: If the build relies on applying ailments such as poison, ignite, or bleed, carefully consider the probability of successful ailment application. Do not assume a 100% application rate, as enemy resistance and ailment avoidance mechanics can reduce the frequency of successful applications. Implement probability into calculations.
Tip 4: Acknowledge Resource Constraints: Resource limitations, such as mana or life, can constrain sustained damage output. Consider the resource cost of skills and the efficiency of resource regeneration or recovery mechanics. A build exhibiting high burst damage may be unsustainable over extended engagements if resource management is inadequate.
Tip 5: Integrate Practical Testing: Supplement theoretical damage projections with practical in-game testing. Evaluate the performance of the build against various enemy types and under different combat conditions. Practical testing can reveal unforeseen limitations or synergies that are not readily apparent from damage assessment tools alone.
Tip 6: Account for Buff Uptime: Many builds rely on temporary buffs to achieve maximum damage output. Accurately assess the typical uptime of these buffs during combat to derive realistic damage projections. Assuming constant buff uptime will result in an overestimation of sustained damage potential.
Effective employment of damage assessment involves a synthesis of theoretical projections and empirical validation. Critical thinking is essential.
Application of these strategies will enhance the efficacy of character building in Path of Exile 2.
Conclusion
The examination of “poe 2 dps calculator” reveals its utility as a decision-making instrument during character progression within Path of Exile 2. These tools furnish quantifiable estimates of damage potential, facilitating comparative analyses of skill configurations, equipment choices, and passive skill allocations. The accuracy of such projections hinges on the sophistication of the tool, the completeness of input data, and a nuanced understanding of game mechanics, including enemy resistances and ailment application probabilities.
The judicious application of a “poe 2 dps calculator”, supplemented by practical in-game validation, offers a strategic advantage in optimizing character efficiency. While these tools do not constitute a definitive measure of character effectiveness, their informed utilization can significantly enhance the character-building process. Continued refinement of damage assessment methodologies promises to further improve the precision and practical relevance of these projections. The strategic incorporation of this technology will have a positive impact for poe 2.
