Determining three times the monthly rental amount involves a simple multiplication. Multiply the stated monthly rent by the number three. For instance, if the monthly rent is $1,000, the calculation would be $1,000 multiplied by 3, resulting in $3,000.
This figure is frequently used by landlords and property managers as a benchmark for assessing a prospective tenant’s financial capability. It serves as a quick indicator to evaluate whether an applicant likely possesses sufficient income to comfortably afford the rent payment each month, along with other living expenses. Historically, this metric has provided a practical and easily understood method for initial screening of potential renters, although its effectiveness may vary depending on individual circumstances and local economic conditions.
The following discussion will delve into the reasons behind this common practice, its potential limitations, and alternative methods that may provide a more comprehensive evaluation of a renter’s financial stability.
1. Income Qualification
Income qualification, in the context of rental agreements, directly relates to the practice of determining a prospective tenant’s financial capacity to afford rent payments. A key metric in this process is the commonly used threshold of three times the monthly rent, which serves as a preliminary indicator of affordability.
-
Minimum Income Threshold
The “three times the rent” rule establishes a minimum income benchmark that applicants must meet to be considered eligible for a specific property. For example, an apartment renting for $1,500 per month typically requires a minimum gross monthly income of $4,500. Failure to meet this threshold can automatically disqualify an applicant or necessitate further scrutiny of their financial situation.
-
Gross vs. Net Income
Income qualification usually considers gross monthly income, which is the total income before taxes and other deductions. Landlords prioritize gross income because it provides a clearer picture of the applicant’s overall earning power, irrespective of their individual tax liabilities or other withholdings. In contrast, net income reflects take-home pay, which can vary significantly based on individual circumstances.
-
Verification of Income
To ensure the accuracy of stated income, landlords typically require documentation such as pay stubs, W-2 forms, or bank statements. Self-employed individuals may need to provide tax returns or profit and loss statements. Rigorous verification helps mitigate the risk of accepting tenants who misrepresent their financial standing.
-
Alternative Income Sources
While employment income is the most common source, landlords may also consider other forms of income, such as alimony, child support, social security benefits, or investment income. The acceptability of these alternative income sources can vary depending on the landlord’s policies and local regulations. However, these sources are generally included in the calculation to assess overall financial stability.
In conclusion, the calculation of three times the rent provides a standardized and easily applicable method for landlords to establish initial income qualification criteria. While this metric offers a preliminary assessment, it is crucial to recognize its limitations and consider other factors, such as debt-to-income ratio and credit history, for a more comprehensive evaluation of a prospective tenant’s financial reliability.
2. Affordability Assessment
The calculation of three times the rent serves as a preliminary component within a broader affordability assessment. It provides a readily quantifiable metric for landlords to evaluate a prospective tenant’s capacity to manage rental costs. The underlying principle is that individuals allocating no more than approximately one-third of their gross income towards housing expenses are less likely to experience financial strain, reducing the risk of late or missed rent payments. This calculation acts as an initial filter; applicants failing to meet this income threshold are often subjected to closer scrutiny or outright rejection due to perceived heightened risk.
However, relying solely on the “three times the rent” calculation presents an incomplete picture of affordability. It does not account for other significant financial obligations such as debt payments (student loans, credit card debt, auto loans), childcare expenses, healthcare costs, or regional variations in the cost of living. For instance, an individual earning three times the rent in a high-cost urban area may still struggle to cover basic necessities, while someone in a more affordable region might have substantial disposable income despite meeting the same income-to-rent ratio. Consider a hypothetical scenario: Applicant A earns $6,000 per month and seeks an apartment renting for $2,000. While meeting the income requirement, Applicant A also has $2,500 in monthly debt payments. Conversely, Applicant B earns $4,500 with $500 in debt, seeking a $1,500 apartment. Though Applicant B’s income is lower, their overall debt load suggests greater affordability.
Therefore, a comprehensive affordability assessment extends beyond this simple calculation. Prudent landlords supplement this metric with additional data, including credit reports, debt-to-income ratios, and employment verification, to gain a more nuanced understanding of an applicant’s financial health and stability. While the calculation of three times the rent offers a convenient initial benchmark, it should be viewed as one data point within a more holistic evaluation process aimed at mitigating financial risk and fostering successful tenancy.
3. Tenant Screening
Tenant screening encompasses a multifaceted process designed to evaluate the suitability of potential renters. A central component of this process often involves determining whether the applicant’s gross monthly income meets or exceeds three times the stated monthly rent. This calculation acts as an initial filter, allowing property managers to quickly identify candidates who may face difficulty meeting their financial obligations. For example, a property management company receiving numerous applications for an apartment renting at $1,200 per month may immediately disqualify applicants with a reported income below $3,600. This initial screening significantly reduces the administrative burden by focusing resources on more financially viable prospects. However, the calculation serves as a preliminary indicator, not a definitive assessment of a prospective tenant’s overall suitability.
The correlation between tenant screening practices and the “three times the rent” guideline stems from its practicality as a readily available and easily understood financial benchmark. Its simplicity enables consistent application across diverse applicant pools and varied property types. Landlords can establish a clear, objective standard, minimizing subjective biases during the application review process. Consider the case of a small landlord managing a single rental property. Lacking the resources for extensive background checks, the landlord may rely heavily on the income-to-rent ratio as a primary screening criterion, supplementing it with a basic credit report. While not exhaustive, this approach provides a baseline level of security against potential financial risks associated with tenant selection.
In conclusion, the “three times the rent” calculation plays a vital, albeit limited, role in tenant screening procedures. Its accessibility and ease of application make it a common first step in evaluating an applicant’s financial capacity. Challenges arise when this metric is used in isolation, neglecting other critical factors such as credit history, debt-to-income ratio, and employment stability. A comprehensive tenant screening strategy integrates the income-to-rent calculation with a more in-depth assessment of the applicant’s overall financial profile, mitigating the risk of selecting tenants who may struggle to meet their rental obligations, regardless of initially meeting the income threshold.
4. Financial Stability
The calculation of three times the rent serves as a preliminary gauge of a prospective tenant’s financial stability. This metric presumes that individuals allocating approximately one-third or less of their gross monthly income to housing costs are better positioned to meet their rental obligations consistently. The rationale is that a lower rent-to-income ratio provides a buffer against unforeseen financial hardships, reducing the risk of delinquency or eviction. However, financial stability is a multifaceted concept, and this single calculation offers only a limited perspective. For instance, an individual earning precisely three times the rent may appear financially stable on the surface, but underlying factors such as substantial debt, irregular income streams, or significant dependent care expenses can substantially erode this perceived stability. Consider a scenario where an applicant earning $4,500 monthly seeks an apartment renting for $1,500; superficially, they meet the standard. However, they simultaneously carry significant student loan debt and high credit card balances, potentially rendering them less financially secure than an applicant with lower income but minimal debt.
The importance of financial stability extends beyond the timely payment of rent. Financially stable tenants are more likely to maintain the property in good condition, adhere to lease terms, and foster positive relationships with landlords and neighbors. Conversely, tenants experiencing financial strain may neglect property upkeep, engage in disputes, or ultimately abandon the property, leading to financial losses for the landlord. Property managers often incorporate credit checks and background investigations to gain a more complete understanding of an applicant’s financial history, providing a more accurate indicator of stability. The inclusion of these extra measures in the decision-making process demonstrates financial stability goes beyond the calculation of three times the rent.
In conclusion, the “three times the rent” calculation provides a readily accessible initial screening tool for assessing financial stability. However, its effectiveness is limited by its failure to account for individual financial circumstances beyond gross income. Landlords and property managers should utilize this calculation as a starting point, augmenting it with a comprehensive review of an applicant’s credit history, debt-to-income ratio, and employment verification to gain a more accurate and holistic understanding of their financial stability and potential as a reliable tenant. By considering a broader range of financial indicators, property owners can mitigate risk and foster more positive and sustainable tenancy relationships.
5. Risk Mitigation
Risk mitigation, in the context of rental property management, involves strategies to minimize potential financial losses arising from tenant-related issues such as rent defaults, property damage, or legal disputes. The practice of calculating three times the rent serves as a foundational element in this risk mitigation process, offering an initial assessment of a prospective tenant’s financial capacity to meet rental obligations. This metric aims to reduce the likelihood of rent arrears, a primary concern for property owners and managers.
-
Reduced Likelihood of Rent Default
Establishing a minimum income threshold, typically three times the rent, directly mitigates the risk of rent default. By screening applicants based on their income relative to the rental cost, property managers aim to select tenants with a demonstrably higher capacity to afford monthly payments. For example, if an applicant’s income barely covers the rent, the risk of default increases significantly, particularly in the event of unforeseen financial emergencies. Conversely, an income significantly exceeding the threshold provides a buffer against potential income fluctuations or unexpected expenses.
-
Lower Eviction Rates
Eviction proceedings represent a significant financial and administrative burden for landlords. The implementation of the “three times the rent” rule, as part of a broader tenant screening process, contributes to lower eviction rates by selecting more financially stable tenants. Tenants who consistently meet their rental obligations are less likely to face eviction due to non-payment. Furthermore, financially stable tenants are often better equipped to address minor property maintenance issues proactively, preventing costly repairs and minimizing the potential for landlord-tenant disputes that could escalate to eviction.
-
Improved Cash Flow Stability
Consistent rent payments are critical for maintaining stable cash flow in rental property management. Calculating three times the rent helps ensure a more predictable income stream by reducing the risk of late or missed payments. Consistent cash flow allows landlords to meet their own financial obligations, such as mortgage payments, property taxes, and maintenance expenses. A predictable income stream also enhances the property’s investment value, making it more attractive to potential buyers or lenders.
-
Minimizing Collection Costs
When tenants default on rent payments, landlords often incur significant costs associated with debt collection, legal fees, and property vacancy. By implementing the “three times the rent” rule as a preliminary screening measure, landlords can minimize the potential for these expenses. Selecting financially responsible tenants reduces the need for aggressive collection tactics and protracted legal battles. Furthermore, a lower incidence of rent defaults translates to lower administrative costs associated with managing delinquent accounts and vacant properties.
In conclusion, the calculation of three times the rent, while not a definitive guarantee of financial responsibility, serves as a critical tool for risk mitigation in rental property management. By establishing a minimum income threshold, landlords can reduce the likelihood of rent defaults, lower eviction rates, improve cash flow stability, and minimize collection costs. However, it is essential to recognize that this metric represents only one element of a comprehensive tenant screening process. Landlords should supplement this calculation with credit checks, background investigations, and other relevant financial information to gain a more holistic assessment of an applicant’s potential to be a reliable tenant, thereby further mitigating risk and fostering more positive tenancy relationships.
6. Rental Agreements
Rental agreements, legally binding contracts between landlords and tenants, frequently incorporate financial criteria to ensure the tenant’s ability to fulfill their payment obligations. One common benchmark employed within these agreements, either explicitly or implicitly, is the guideline of requiring tenants to demonstrate income equal to, or exceeding, three times the monthly rent. This practice serves to mitigate risk for the landlord and provide a reasonable assurance of consistent rent payments throughout the lease term.
-
Income Verification Clauses
Rental agreements often include clauses that explicitly require prospective tenants to provide documentation verifying their income. These clauses may specify acceptable forms of verification, such as pay stubs, W-2 forms, or tax returns. The landlord uses this information to determine if the applicant meets the income threshold, which is often implicitly tied to the “three times the rent” calculation, even if not explicitly stated within the agreement itself. Failure to provide adequate income verification may result in denial of the application.
-
Breach of Contract Implications
While the rental agreement may not always explicitly state the “three times the rent” guideline, it invariably outlines the consequences of failing to pay rent. Non-payment constitutes a breach of contract, triggering legal remedies for the landlord, including eviction proceedings and collection actions. By implicitly relying on the “three times the rent” benchmark during the tenant screening process, landlords aim to minimize the likelihood of such breaches, thereby reducing potential legal and financial complications arising from the rental agreement.
-
Rent Escalation Provisions
Some rental agreements include provisions for periodic rent increases. Landlords considering such escalations may implicitly reassess whether the tenant’s income continues to meet the “three times the rent” guideline, albeit informally. While not legally binding, this reassessment helps landlords gauge the tenant’s ability to absorb future rent increases without facing undue financial strain, thus informing decisions about implementing rent escalation clauses.
-
Assignment and Subletting Restrictions
Rental agreements typically include clauses governing assignment (transferring the entire lease to another party) and subletting (renting out a portion of the property to another party). When a tenant seeks to assign or sublet, the landlord often retains the right to approve the new tenant. In exercising this right, the landlord may apply the “three times the rent” calculation to the proposed assignee or subtenant, ensuring that the new occupant also possesses the financial capacity to meet the rental obligations under the existing agreement. This protects the landlord’s financial interests even if the original tenant is no longer residing on the property.
In summary, while the phrase “three times the rent” may not be explicitly codified in every rental agreement, the underlying principle frequently informs tenant selection and contract enforcement. Landlords use this benchmark, either directly or indirectly, to assess financial risk, minimize potential breaches, and ensure the stability of rental income throughout the term of the agreement. The assessment is performed to see if the prospective tentant is able to fulfill the contract obligations.
7. Property Management
Property management encompasses the oversight and administration of rental properties on behalf of owners. A core function within property management is tenant screening, where the financial evaluation of prospective renters plays a pivotal role. The “three times the rent” calculation emerges as a practical tool for initial assessment of applicant suitability, influencing various aspects of property management operations.
-
Tenant Acquisition and Qualification
Property managers employ the “three times the rent” metric as a preliminary filter during tenant acquisition. Advertisements may specify this income requirement, and applications are often reviewed based on this standard. For instance, a property manager handling an apartment complex with units renting for $1,800 per month might stipulate a minimum gross monthly income of $5,400 for applicants. This initial screening streamlines the process, focusing resources on financially viable candidates and reducing the administrative burden of processing unqualified applications.
-
Lease Enforcement and Rent Collection
The “three times the rent” guideline indirectly supports lease enforcement and rent collection efforts. Tenants who initially meet the income threshold are statistically more likely to meet their rental obligations consistently. Property managers actively monitor rent payments and pursue collection actions in cases of delinquency. The higher the ratio between income and rent, the more manageable a tenant’s finances will typically be, and the better the chance of a successful tenant experience. This helps reduce the workload and costs associated with late payments and potential eviction proceedings.
-
Property Valuation and Investment Analysis
The overall financial performance of a managed property, including occupancy rates and rent collection efficiency, directly impacts its valuation and attractiveness to investors. Property managers demonstrate the stability and profitability of their managed properties through consistent rent collection. The “three times the rent” calculation serves as a benchmark for maintaining high-quality tenant pools, ensuring a stable rental income stream, and enhancing the property’s market value. Properties with tenants who met the financial parameters tend to have fewer issues.
-
Compliance and Legal Considerations
Property managers must adhere to fair housing laws and avoid discriminatory practices in tenant selection. While the “three times the rent” rule is generally considered an objective financial criterion, property managers must apply it consistently across all applicants and avoid using it as a pretext for discrimination. For example, a property manager cannot selectively apply this rule based on race, ethnicity, or other protected characteristics. Proper documentation and consistent application of the rule are crucial for maintaining compliance and avoiding legal challenges.
In conclusion, the “three times the rent” calculation is a standard operating procedure to qualify prospects. It directly impacts tenant acquisition, indirectly supports lease enforcement and property valuation, and must be applied judiciously to comply with legal and ethical standards in property management.
8. Creditworthiness Indicator
The assessment of creditworthiness serves as a critical component in evaluating a prospective tenant’s overall financial risk. While the calculation of three times the rent provides a preliminary indication of income adequacy, it does not account for existing debt obligations or past payment behavior. A strong credit history, as reflected in a credit report and credit score, signifies a responsible approach to managing financial obligations, suggesting a lower risk of rent default, even if the applicant’s income only marginally exceeds the established rent threshold. Conversely, a poor credit history may raise concerns about the applicant’s ability to meet financial commitments, regardless of income level. For instance, an individual earning four times the rent with a history of late payments and significant debt may present a higher risk than an applicant earning three times the rent with a pristine credit record and minimal debt.
Credit scores are generated by credit bureaus, these provide a quantifiable metric for assessing creditworthiness, ranging from poor to excellent. Landlords often use a minimum credit score requirement as part of their tenant screening criteria, alongside the income-to-rent ratio. The weight assigned to creditworthiness varies depending on landlord policy and local market conditions. In competitive rental markets, landlords may prioritize applicants with higher credit scores, even if their income is slightly lower than that of other applicants. Furthermore, credit reports reveal information about past evictions, bankruptcies, and judgments, providing insights into an applicant’s rental history and legal obligations. This data supplements the income assessment, allowing for a more comprehensive risk evaluation. Consider a scenario where two applicants both meet the income requirement. Applicant A possesses a credit score of 750 with no history of late payments, while Applicant B has a score of 580 with several delinquencies. All other factors being equal, Applicant A is generally deemed a lower-risk tenant due to their superior creditworthiness.
In summary, while the calculation of three times the rent offers a convenient starting point for assessing financial suitability, the creditworthiness indicator provides a crucial layer of insight into an applicant’s financial behavior and risk profile. Landlords who integrate credit assessments into their tenant screening process make a more informed decision, mitigating the risk of rent defaults and fostering more stable and successful tenancy relationships. Relying solely on income assessment without considering credit history presents an incomplete picture and increases the potential for adverse outcomes.
9. Debt-to-Income Ratio
The debt-to-income ratio (DTI) serves as a critical supplement to the standard practice of assessing a prospective tenant’s financial suitability by calculating three times the rent. While meeting the income threshold provides a preliminary indication of affordability, the DTI offers a more nuanced perspective by factoring in existing financial obligations, offering a refined metric of financial strain.
-
Calculation and Interpretation
The DTI is calculated by dividing total monthly debt payments by gross monthly income, expressed as a percentage. This ratio indicates the proportion of monthly income allocated to debt repayment, encompassing expenses such as credit card bills, student loans, auto loans, and other recurring financial obligations. A lower DTI suggests a greater capacity to manage rent payments comfortably, while a higher DTI indicates a potentially strained financial situation, even if income meets the three-times-the-rent criterion. For example, consider two applicants for a $1,500 apartment. Applicant A earns $4,500 monthly (meeting the income standard) with $500 in debt payments, resulting in a DTI of 11%. Applicant B earns the same but has $2,000 in monthly debts, yielding a DTI of 44%. While both meet the income requirement, Applicant B’s significantly higher DTI suggests a greater risk of struggling to afford rent alongside other financial commitments.
-
Impact on Affordability Assessment
The DTI provides a more accurate reflection of affordability than income alone. An applicant whose income barely meets the three-times-the-rent requirement but possesses a high DTI may struggle to consistently meet rental obligations. Conversely, an applicant with a slightly lower income but a low DTI may demonstrate greater financial stability. Landlords utilizing DTI in their tenant screening process are better equipped to differentiate between applicants who appear financially sound on the surface and those who possess true financial resilience. For instance, an applicant with a high DTI may be denied, even if they meet the income threshold, if the DTI indicates an unsustainable level of financial obligation.
-
Risk Mitigation in Tenant Selection
Integrating DTI into the tenant screening process enhances risk mitigation strategies for landlords. By considering both income and debt obligations, landlords gain a more complete picture of an applicant’s financial risk profile. Applicants with high DTIs are more likely to experience financial difficulties, increasing the risk of late or missed rent payments, property damage due to neglect, and eventual eviction proceedings. Therefore, prioritizing applicants with lower DTIs can significantly reduce the potential for financial losses and administrative burdens associated with problem tenancies. This data may also suggest if the prospect is a good canidate for other financial assistance.
-
Legal and Ethical Considerations
When incorporating DTI into tenant screening, it is crucial to comply with fair housing laws and avoid discriminatory practices. Landlords must apply DTI criteria consistently across all applicants and avoid using it as a pretext for discriminating against protected classes. For example, it would be illegal to apply a stricter DTI standard to applicants of a particular race or national origin. Transparent and objective application of DTI criteria, alongside other financial metrics, ensures fair and equitable tenant selection practices.
In conclusion, while the calculation of three times the rent provides a convenient and readily accessible method for establishing preliminary income qualification, the DTI offers a more comprehensive and insightful assessment of a prospective tenant’s ability to manage rental obligations responsibly. Integrating DTI into the tenant screening process enhances risk mitigation efforts, improves affordability assessments, and promotes fairer and more equitable tenant selection practices. It is essential to consider how this financial situation will affect the tenancy contract and outcomes.
Frequently Asked Questions
This section addresses common inquiries regarding the calculation of three times the rent, its application, and its limitations in assessing tenant financial suitability.
Question 1: What precisely constitutes the calculation of three times the rent?
The calculation involves multiplying the stated monthly rental amount by the factor of three. The resulting figure represents the minimum gross monthly income often required of prospective tenants.
Question 2: Why is this calculation commonly used in tenant screening?
It provides a readily accessible benchmark for assessing a tenant’s ability to afford rent payments, suggesting that housing costs should ideally comprise no more than one-third of gross monthly income.
Question 3: Does this calculation guarantee a tenant’s ability to pay rent?
No. While it offers a preliminary assessment of income adequacy, it does not account for other financial obligations such as debt, or variations in cost of living.
Question 4: What documentation is typically required to verify income?
Acceptable forms of verification often include pay stubs, W-2 forms, tax returns, or bank statements. Requirements may vary depending on the landlord or property management company.
Question 5: Is this calculation discriminatory?
The calculation itself is not inherently discriminatory. However, consistent application across all applicants is crucial to comply with fair housing laws. Unequal application may constitute illegal discrimination.
Question 6: Are there alternatives to this calculation for assessing tenant financial risk?
Yes. Credit reports, debt-to-income ratios, and employment verification provide a more comprehensive evaluation of a tenant’s financial stability than relying solely on the “three times the rent” calculation.
In summary, the calculation of three times the rent provides a convenient initial screening tool, but should be supplemented with additional financial information for a more thorough assessment of tenant suitability.
The following section will explore advanced strategies for mitigating financial risk in rental property management.
Strategies Informed by the “Three Times the Rent” Guideline
The calculation of three times the rent provides a foundational element in assessing prospective tenant financials. The following strategies offer refined approaches to leveraging this metric for improved property management.
Tip 1: Incorporate Debt-to-Income (DTI) Analysis: Calculate the DTI ratio in conjunction with the income assessment. An applicant meeting the income threshold but exhibiting a high DTI may pose a greater financial risk than an applicant with a slightly lower income and a more manageable debt load. Establish clear DTI thresholds to guide tenant selection.
Tip 2: Prioritize Credit History Review: A thorough examination of credit reports can reveal patterns of responsible or irresponsible financial behavior. Give preference to applicants with strong credit scores and a clean payment history, even if their income only marginally exceeds the three-times-the-rent benchmark.
Tip 3: Implement a Tiered Screening System: Develop a tiered system categorizing applicants based on a combination of income, DTI, and credit score. Higher-scoring applicants may qualify for expedited approval, while those in lower tiers require additional scrutiny.
Tip 4: Verify Employment Stability: Confirm length of employment and employer contact information to assess the stability of income. Frequent job changes may indicate income volatility, even if current earnings meet the threshold.
Tip 5: Consider Regional Cost-of-Living Adjustments: In high-cost areas, the three-times-the-rent calculation may not accurately reflect affordability. Factor in regional cost-of-living indices to adjust income requirements accordingly.
Tip 6: Analyze Income Trends: If available, examine historical income data to identify upward or downward trends. A declining income trend may signal future financial difficulties, even if the current income meets the requirement.
Tip 7: Enforce Consistent Application: Strictly adhere to pre-defined financial criteria to avoid discriminatory practices. Document all screening decisions and ensure consistent application of policies across all applicants.
Adopting these strategies, informed by the “three times the rent” principle, facilitates a more nuanced and effective approach to tenant screening, enhancing risk mitigation and promoting stable tenancy relationships.
The subsequent conclusion will consolidate the key findings and provide actionable recommendations for property managers and landlords.
Conclusion
The foregoing analysis has explored the calculation of three times the rent as a foundational metric in tenant screening and property management. This calculation provides a readily accessible benchmark for assessing a prospective tenant’s ability to meet rental obligations. However, its limitations as a singular indicator of financial stability have been thoroughly examined. The discussion emphasized the necessity of supplementing this calculation with additional data, including debt-to-income ratios, credit reports, and employment verification, to gain a more comprehensive understanding of an applicant’s overall financial profile and risk potential. The assessment of risk in renting goes beyond just a single calculation.
Adopting a holistic approach to tenant screening, incorporating the outlined strategies, is paramount to mitigating financial risk and fostering positive tenancy relationships. Landlords and property managers are encouraged to implement these refined approaches to tenant evaluation, ensuring fair, equitable, and sustainable rental practices. Further research should be conducted in the future to identify more appropriate methods for tenant evaluation. The information collected for proper verification should stay within compliance and be thoroughly reviewed by landlords to minimize the risk of financial hardship for the landlord, and possibly the tenant.
